{"id":7838,"date":"2023-06-07T10:41:00","date_gmt":"2023-06-07T10:41:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/cukurpartners.com\/record-fine-imposed-for-violating-eu-data-protection-regulation\/"},"modified":"2023-06-08T06:17:14","modified_gmt":"2023-06-08T06:17:14","slug":"avrupa-birligi-veri-koruma-tuzugu-gdpr-ihlali-icin-rekor-ceza","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/old.cukurpartners.com\/tr\/avrupa-birligi-veri-koruma-tuzugu-gdpr-ihlali-icin-rekor-ceza\/","title":{"rendered":"AVRUPA B\u0130RL\u0130\u011e\u0130 VER\u0130 KORUMA T\u00dcZ\u00dc\u011e\u00dc (\u201cGDPR\u201d) \u0130HLAL\u0130 \u0130\u00c7\u0130N REKOR CEZA"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">G\u00fcndemde s\u0131kl\u0131kla g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00fczere; ki\u015fisel verilerin korunmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin yetkili otorite yapt\u0131r\u0131mlar\u0131, T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de oldu\u011fu gibi Avrupa Birli\u011fi\u2019nde de yayg\u0131n \u015fekilde devam ediyor. \u0130rlanda Veri Koruma Otoritesi (DPC), Meta Platforms Ireland Limited (Meta) ve AB veri koruma d\u00fczenlemelerini ihlali konusunda tarihi bir karar a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131. A\u011fustos 2020&#8217;de ba\u015flayan ve May\u0131s 2021&#8217;de yeniden ba\u015flayan soru\u015fturma, Meta&#8217;n\u0131n Facebook hizmeti arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla AB\/EEE&#8217;den ABD&#8217;ye ki\u015fisel verilerin transferi \u00fczerine odakland\u0131. Denetim otoriteleri aras\u0131nda uzla\u015fma sa\u011flama giri\u015fimlerine ra\u011fmen, DPC s\u00f6z konusu soru\u015fturman\u0131n \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm\u00fc i\u00e7in kendisinin bir \u00fcst mercii olan Avrupa Veri Koruma Kurulu&#8217;na (EDPB) ba\u015fvurdu. EDPB 13 Nisan 2023&#8217;te ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 bir karar yay\u0131mlad\u0131 ve bu soru\u015fturma s\u00fcreci DPC&#8217;nin 12 May\u0131s 2023&#8217;te verdi\u011fi nihai karar\u0131yla sonu\u00e7land\u0131. S\u00fcrecin sonunda, Meta&#8217;ya 1.3. milyar Amerikan Dolar\u0131 tutar\u0131ndaki Avrupa Birli\u011fi\u2019nin ana ki\u015fisel veri mevzuat\u0131 olan GDPR tarihindeki en y\u00fcksek ceza verildi.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DPC&#8217;nin karar\u0131, Meta&#8217;n\u0131n yeterli gizlilik \u00f6nlemleri olmaks\u0131z\u0131n Avrupa kullan\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n verilerini ABD sunucular\u0131na hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131 bir \u015fekilde aktarmas\u0131n\u0131 konu al\u0131yor. Avrupa Adalet Divan\u0131&#8217;n\u0131n (CJEU) AB ve ABD aras\u0131ndaki veri transferlerine ili\u015fkin ge\u00e7mi\u015fte vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu a\u00e7\u0131k bir karar bulunmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen; Meta\u2019n\u0131n, Avrupa Komisyonu taraf\u0131ndan sunulan g\u00fcncellenmi\u015f Standart S\u00f6zle\u015fme Maddelerini kullanarak bu aktar\u0131mlara devam etti\u011fi g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcyor. Bununla birlikte, DPC&#8217;nin karar\u0131, Meta&#8217;n\u0131n AB\u2019deki kullan\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n ki\u015fisel verilerini yeterince koruyamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ortaya koymakla birlikte, sorumlulu\u011fu sadece Meta&#8217;ya atamak yerine ABD ve AB yasalar\u0131 aras\u0131ndaki farkl\u0131l\u0131klara da dikkat \u00e7ekiyor.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DPC&#8217;nin para cezas\u0131na ili\u015fkin karar\u0131, EDPB&#8217;nin ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 karar\u0131n\u0131 dikkate alarak ihlalin do\u011fas\u0131, ciddiyeti ve s\u00fcresi, etkilenen kullan\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131n say\u0131s\u0131 ve maruz kald\u0131klar\u0131 zarar gibi fakt\u00f6rleri g\u00f6zetiyor. Bu noktada, para cezas\u0131n\u0131n rekor tutar\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendirirken Meta&#8217;n\u0131n Avrupa&#8217;da 309 milyon g\u00fcnl\u00fck aktif kullan\u0131c\u0131s\u0131 oldu\u011funu g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcnde bulundurmak gerekiyor.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Karardaki di\u011fer bir \u00f6nemli bir nokta ise, Meta&#8217;n\u0131n Standart S\u00f6zle\u015fme Maddeleri\u2019ne dayanarak devam etmekte oldu\u011fu veri aktar\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131n gizlilik h\u00fck\u00fcmleri a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan yeterli olup olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 oldu. EDPB&#8217;nin karar\u0131, DPC&#8217;nin de\u011ferlendirmesine at\u0131fta bulunarak, Meta&#8217;n\u0131n uluslararas\u0131 veri transferleri i\u00e7in kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131 2021 Standart S\u00f6zle\u015fme Maddeleri&#8217;nin ABD mevzuat\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan sa\u011flanan yetersiz d\u00fczeydeki koruma a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan bir iyile\u015ftirme sa\u011flamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade ediyor ve bu eksikli\u011fin giderilmedi\u011fi sonucuna var\u0131yor. Meta ise, b\u00f6yle \u00f6nlemlere ihtiya\u00e7 olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 sonucuna varan bir savunma kapsam\u0131nda esasen gerekli ek \u00f6nlemler ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 iddia ederek, ABD yasalar\u0131n\u0131n ve uygulamalar\u0131n\u0131n AB yasas\u0131na e\u015fde\u011fer koruma sundu\u011funu savunmakta.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Bu ba\u011flamda, DPC karar\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda otoritesini kullanarak \u00fc\u00e7 adet direktifte bulundu. Yukar\u0131da bahse konu edilen para cezas\u0131na ek olarak; Meta, DPC&#8217;nin karar\u0131ndan itibaren gelecekteki ABD&#8217;ye yapmakta oldu\u011fu ki\u015fisel veri aktar\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131 be\u015f ay i\u00e7inde ask\u0131ya almak zorunda. Ayr\u0131ca, Meta\u2019n\u0131n, DPC&#8217;nin karar\u0131ndan itibaren GDPR&#8217;yi ihlal eden AB\/EEE kullan\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n ki\u015fisel verilerinin hukuka i\u015flenmesini ve depolanmas\u0131n\u0131 alt\u0131 ay i\u00e7inde durdurarak GDPR&#8217;ye uymas\u0131 gerekiyor.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: right;\"><b>Avukat Burcu G\u00fcr<\/b><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>G\u00fcndemde s\u0131kl\u0131kla g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc \u00fczere; ki\u015fisel verilerin korunmas\u0131na ili\u015fkin yetkili otorite yapt\u0131r\u0131mlar\u0131, T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de oldu\u011fu gibi Avrupa Birli\u011fi\u2019nde de yayg\u0131n \u015fekilde devam ediyor. \u0130rlanda Veri Koruma Otoritesi (DPC), Meta Platforms Ireland Limited (Meta) ve AB veri koruma d\u00fczenlemelerini ihlali konusunda tarihi bir karar a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131. A\u011fustos 2020&#8217;de ba\u015flayan ve May\u0131s 2021&#8217;de yeniden ba\u015flayan soru\u015fturma, Meta&#8217;n\u0131n Facebook hizmeti arac\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131yla [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[45,44,35,42,43],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7838","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bilisim-medya-ve-fikri-mulkiyet","category-insan-kaynaklari-ve-is-hukuku","category-is-hayatina-bakis","category-sirketler-ve-ticaret-hukuku","category-yasal-mevzuata-uyum"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.cukurpartners.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7838"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.cukurpartners.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.cukurpartners.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.cukurpartners.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.cukurpartners.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7838"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/old.cukurpartners.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7838\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7840,"href":"https:\/\/old.cukurpartners.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7838\/revisions\/7840"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/old.cukurpartners.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7838"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.cukurpartners.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7838"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/old.cukurpartners.com\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7838"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}